ST. GREGORY OF NYSSA'S CONCEPT OF HYPOSTASIS

  • Torstein Tollefsen
Keywords: Capadocan Fathers, hypostasis, energeia, Eunomian and Apollinarian controversy

Abstract

Contrary to what some scholars seem to have held, in the Cappadocian
Fathers there can be no ontology of the Trinity. God, according to the Cappadocians,
transcends every possibility of being grasped by the human mind. The terminology of ousia
and energeia is therefore conceived as a human strategy of speaking of God economically
with a view to problems that originated with the Eunomian and Apollinarian controversy.
Gregory's approach to this kind of language is rather pragmatic, and he stresses the
importance of regulating all talk of God by the sense (or experience) of what is proper or
dignified to say.

References

Dexippus, On Aristotle Categories, transl. by J. Dillon, London 1990
Grillmeier, A., Christ in Christian Tradition, vol. 1, London and Oxford 1975. First
publication in English 1965.
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N., The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1-2, Cambridge 1992.
First published in 1987.
Quasten, J., Patrology, vol. III, Westminster, Maryland 1994. First published in Utrecht
1950.
Stramara, D.F., "Gregory of Nyssa, Ad Graecos 'How It Is That We Say There Are Three
Persons In The Divinity But Not Say There Are Three Gods' (To The Greeks: Concerning
The Commonality Of Concepts)", The Greek Orthodox Theological Review, vol. 41, no. 4,
1996, pp. 375-391.
Tollefsen, T., The Christocentric Cosmology of St. Maximus the Confessor, Oslo 2000.
Turcescu, L., "The Concept of Divine Persons in Gregory of Nyssa's To His Brother Peter,
on the Difference Between Ousia and Hypostasis", The Greek Orthodox Theological
Review, vol. 42, no. 1-2, 1997, pp. 63-83.
Wesche, K.P., "'Mind' and 'Self' in the Christology of Saint Gregory the Theologian: Saint
Gregory's Contribution to Christology and Christian Anthropology", The Greek Orthodox
Theological Review, vol. 39, no. 1, 1994, pp. 33-61.
Published
2019-10-08