THE AUTHORITY OF DIONYSIUS PSEUDO-AREOPAGITE IN THE TREATISE ON DIVINE UNITIES AND DISTINCTIONS OF GREGORY PALAMAS
Abstract
The paper considers the way in which Gregory Palamas relates himself to the
person and literary heritage of Dionysius Pseudo-Areopagite in his short, but systematic
and relevant treatise On divine unities and distinctions. The special accent is put on the
question of authority; namely, taking as undisputable fact that the author of areopagitic
writings was indeed a pupil of apostle Paul, Palamas misses the opportunity critically to
reinvestigate the real authorship of areopagitic writings, despite the fact that he, being
forced by polemical context, undoubtedly comes to the point where he puts this question,
question that could lead him to the debunking of this alleged authority from the apostolic
time. In this way it becomes clear that, despite the hermeneutic fruitfulness of his
interpretation of areopagitic writings, Gregory Palamas, out of his (uncritical) loyalty to the
authority and tradition, at this point has remained blind for some facts that a mind more
independent from the authority and tradition would be more eager to notice and, more
important, to acknowledge.
References
Beggiani S. J., „Theology at the Service of Mysticism: Method in PseudoDionysius“, Theological Studies 57 (1996) 201–223.
Blackstone J., „Reading Denys in late Byzantium: Gregory Palamas’s Approach to the Theological Categories of ’apophasis’ and ’union and distinction’“, у: E. Russell, ed., Spirituality in Late Byzantium: Essays Presenting New Research by International Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2009, 45–55.
Bucur B. G., „Dionysius East and West: Unities, Differentiations, and the Exegesis of Biblical Theophanies“, Dionysius 26 (2008) 115–138.
Coakley S., Stang C. M., ed., Re-thinking Dionysius the Areopagite, Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 [= Modern Theology 24, 4 (2008) 531–754].
Corpus Dionysiacum I. De Divinis Nominibus. Herausgegeben von B. R. Suchla, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1990.
Denys l’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Actes du Colloque International, Paris, 21–24 septembre 1994, édités par Y. de Andia, Études
Augustiniennes. Collection Antiquité № 151, Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes 1997.
Demetracopoulos J., Is Gregory Palamas an Existentialist? The Restoration of the True Meaning of His Comment on „Exodus“ 3, 14: „Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν“, Athens: Παρουσία 1996.
Δημητρακόπουλος Γ. Ἀ., Αὐγουστῖνος καί Γρηγόριος Παλαμᾶς. Τά προβλήματα τῶν ἀριστοτελικῶν κατηγοριῶν καί τῆς τριαδικῆς ψυχοθεολογίας, Ἀθήνα: Παρουσία 1997. Δημητρακόπουλος Ἰ. Ἀ., „Ὑστεροβυζαντινὴ κοσμολογία. Ἡ κριτικὴ τοῦ Γρηγορίου Παλαμᾶ στὴ διδασκαλία τῶν Πλωτίνου καὶ Πρόκλου περὶ ’κοσμικῆς ψυχῆς’“, Φιλοσοφία 31 (2001) 175–191; 32 (2002) 111–132.
Δημητρακόπουλος Ἰ. Ἀ., „Γρηγορίου Παλαμᾶ, Κεφάλαια ἑκατὸν πεντήκοντα, 1–14: ’Περὶ κόσμου’. Κείμενο, μετάφραση καὶ ἑρμηνευτικὰ σχόλια“, Byzantiaka 20 (2000) 293/5–348.
Διονύσιος ὁ Ἀρεοπαγίτης, Περὶ θείων ὀνομάτων, у: J. P. Migne, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Graeca, vol. 3, Paris 1889.
Fisher J., „The Theology of Dissimilarity: Negation in Pseudo-Dionysius“, Journal of Religion 81 (2001) 529–548.
Flogaus R., „Inspiration – Exploitation – Distortion: The Use of St Augustine in the Hesychast Controversy“, у: G. Demacopoulos, A. Papanikolaou, ed., Orthodox
Readings of Augustine, Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press 2008, 63–80.
Флоровскій Г. В., Византійскіе Отцы V–VIII, Богословіе Отцевъ Церкви, Париж: YMCA-Press = Источни оци V–VIII века, превео М. Р. Мијатов, Хиландарски
путокази № 28, Манастир Хиландар 1998.
Florovsky G., „Γρηγόριος ὁ Παλαμᾶς καὶ ἡ πατερικὴ παράδοσις“, Γρηγόριος ὁ Παλαμᾶς 43 (1960) 101–115 = Πανηγυρικὸς τόμος ἑορτασμοῦ τῆς ἑξακοσιοστῆς ἐπετείου τοῦ θανάτου τοῦ Ἁγίου Γρηγορίου τοῦ Παλαμᾶ Ἀρχιεπισκόπου Θεσσαλονίκης 1359–1959. Ἐπιμελείᾳ: τοῦ Γεν. Γραμματέως τῆς ἐπιτροπῆς ἑορτασμοῦ καθηγητοῦ Π. Κ. Χρήστου, ἐν Θεσσαλονίκῃ: Ἡ Ἱερᾶ Μητρόπολις Θεσσαλονίκης: Ἡ Θεολογικὴ Σχολὴ τοῦ Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλονίκης 1960, 240–254 = „Saint Gregory Palamas and the Tradition of the Fathers“, у: Florovsky, The Collected Works, ed. by R. C. Haugh, I–XIV. I: Bible, Church, Tradition: An Eastern Orthodox View, Vaduz: Buchervertriebsanstalt 1972, 1987, 105–120 = „Григорије Палама и светоотачко предање“, превео са грчког И. Буловић, Теолошки погледи V, 1 (1972) 27–38 = Свети Григорије Палама, Господе, просвети таму моју. Изабране беседе. Приредио Ј. Србуљ. Превод са јелинског изворника А. Пантелић (беседе 35–37, 42–44, 50–54). Превод са руског језика М. Станковић (беседе 1–3, 5, 8,18–24, 26). Превод са руског језика Р. Лазић (беседе 16, 27, 31, 38, 41), Образ светачки № 24, Београд 1999, 5–19.
Gadamer H.-G., Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischer Hermeneutik, у: Gadamer, Gesammelte Werke. Band 1. Hermeneutik I, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) [1960, 21965, 31972, 41975, 51986] 61990 = H. G. Gadamer, Istina i metoda. Osnovi filozofske hermeneutike, prijevod S. Novak, pogovor A. Šarčević, Biblioteka Logos, Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša 1978.
Gadamer H.-G., „Wahrheit in den Geisteswissenschaften“, у: Gadamer, Gesammelte Werke. Band 2. Hermeneutik II. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzugen.
Register, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) [1986] 21993 = Х. Г. Гадамер, „Истина у духовним наукама“, у: Гадамер, Похвала теорији, превео С. Радојчић, Подгорица: Октоих 1996.
Gadamer H.-G., „Reply to David Detmer“, у: The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Edited by L. E. Hahn, Chicago: Open Court 1997.
Gersh S., From Iamblichus to Eriugena. An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition, Studien zur Problemgeschichte der antiken und mittelalterlichen Philosophie № 8, Leiden: Brill 1978.
Golitzin A., „’A Contemplative and a Liturgist’: Father Georges Florovsky on the ’Corpus Dionysiacum’“, St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 43 (1999) 131–161.
Golitzin, A. „Ὁ Διονύσιος ὁ Ἀρεοπαγίτης στά ἔργα τοῦ ἁγίου Γρηγορίου Παλαμᾶ: περί τοῦ ἐρωτήματος μίας ’χριστολογικῆς ἐπανόρθωσης’ καί ἄλλων σχετικῶν θεμάτων“, у: Ὁ ἅγιος Γρηγόριος ὁ Παλαμᾶς στήν ἱστορία καί τό παρόν. Πρακτικὰ Διεθνῶν ἐπιστημονικῶν συνεδρίων Ἀθηνῶν (13–15 Νοεμβρίου 1998) καί Λεμεσοῦ (5–7 Νοεμβρίου 1999). Ἐποπτεία Γ.
Ἰ. Μαντζαρίδη, Ἅγιον Ὄρος: Ἱερά Μεγίστη Μονή Βατοπαιδίου 2000, 619–643 = „Dionysius the Areopagite in the Works of Gregory Palamas. On the Question of a ’Christological Corrective’ and Related Matters“, St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 46, 2–3 (2002) 163–190 = Scrinium 3 (2007) 83–105.
Γρηγορίου Παλαμᾶ, Β΄ Πρὸς Βαρλαάμ, у: Γρηγορίου τοῦ Παλαμᾶ Συγγράμματα. Ἐκδίδονται ἐπιμελείᾳ Π. Κ. Χρήστου. Τόμος Α΄. Λόγοι ἀποδεικτικοί. Ἀντεπιγραφαί. Ἐπιστολαὶ πρὸς Βαρλαὰμ καὶ Ἀκίνδυνον. Ὑπὲρ ἡσυχαζόντων. Ἐκδίδουν B. Bobrinsky, Π. Παπαευαγγέλου, I. Meyendorff, Π. Χρήστου, Θεσσαλονίκη: Κυρομάνος 1962, 21988, 260–295.
Γρηγορίου τοῦ Παλαμᾶ Συγγράμματα. Ἐκδίδονται ἐπιμελείᾳ Π. Κ. Χρήστου. Τόμος Β΄. Πραγματεῖαι καὶ ἐπιστολαὶ γραφεῖσαι κατὰ τὰ ἔτη 1340–1346. Προλογίζει Π. Χρήστου. Ἐκδίδουν Γ. Μαντζαρίδης, Ν. Ματσούκας, Β. Ψευτογκᾶς, Θεσσαλονίκη:Κυρομάνος [1966] 21994, 69–95.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).